|
The RU486 debate and the Lockhart Review Committee
Report have highlighted a drift of ethics from what we might
call moral absolutes, effectively resulting in medicine without
morality.
Evidence Based Medicine without consideration of outcome
morality is bad medicine and could be used to consider euthanasia
techniques or even the transplanting of organs from clones
bred for that purpose. How to do it `best´ and `legal´
is not all that matters.
There is a need then for ethics in medicine to be re-anchored
to those inherent moral standards in the human consciousness
that we call natural law or moral law.
In the interests of our nation we cannot afford medicine
without morality.
|